Skip to content

Tasting life twice

I've been a bad writer since primary school, all mimicry and dread. Then a line from Anaïs Nin reframed the whole thing, and I decided to write every day, in public, badly at first.

planted June 23, 2026 · last tended June 23, 2026

Taking shape. Has structure and at least one real source or experiment.


The other night, I found myself deep in an unplanned, unexplainable Instagram Reels doomscroll. But the rabbit hole took an unexpected turn when a clip of Phoebe Waller-Bridge popped up. She mentioned a quote by Anaïs Nin that completely knocked something loose in me: ‘We write to taste life twice, in the moment and in retrospect.”*

I put the phone down.

I’ve been a bad writer my whole life. Not modest, humblebrag bad. Genuinely bad. Since primary school I dreaded essays: the blank page, the throat-clearing intro, the whole performance. And whatever I handed in was never really mine. It was mimicry. I’d soak up the cadence of whichever writer I’d last admired and counterfeit it, poorly, hoping nobody noticed there was no actual person under the borrowed voice. (That specific dread earned its own note: the-pseudo-intellectual-fear.)

For years I read all of that as a verdict. Some people can write, I can’t, file it under fixed traits, move on.

Nin cracked the verdict open. Writing isn’t a talent test you pass or fail. It’s a way of living the same hour twice: once while it happens, blurred and half-understood, and again on the page, where you finally get to slow it down and look. The goal was never to sound like someone else. It’s to taste my own life a second time, in my own mouth.

Which flips the bad writing completely. The mimicry wasn’t a shortage of talent. It was a shortage of me. I was so busy impersonating real writers that I never got around to saying anything I actually meant. You can’t taste life twice with someone else’s tongue.

So here’s the turn. I’m done treating writing as a gift I didn’t get handed at birth, and I’m going to treat it as a habit I build: badly at first, in public, on the record, every single day. Including the days the sentences come out crooked. Especially those, because the crooked days are where the second tasting does its real work. That’s the whole wager of this garden, the one I laid out in learning-in-public: publish at the moment of learning, not the moment of mastery.

So, fair warning. The early notes here will read like me learning to walk in shoes that are finally my own. That’s the point. Come back in a year and tell me whether the limp turned into a stride.

Paths that lead here

No paths yet. This note is still off the beaten track.

Where this note points

  • The Pseudo-Intellectual Fear · The terror of sounding smart instead of being smart, and accidentally becoming the very thing you dread. A look at processing fluency, the Dunning-Kruger trap, and why jargon is so easy to mistake for understanding.
  • Learning in public · The operating philosophy of this whole garden: publish the process, not just the conclusions.

More from these beds

  • Metacognition, Eileen Gu, and the Fear of Going Public · The thing elite performers and good thinkers share is not raw talent; it is metacognition, the skill of watching your own mind. Here is what it is, why putting yourself out there feels so irreversible, and why the spotlight effect means it matters less than you think.
  • Not a Toaster: The Secret Superpower Called 'Why?' · A toaster never asks whether it should toast. Humans do, and that pause has a name. A tour of philosophy: first principles, the Socratic method, epistemology, and why the annoying 'Why?' game is a real superpower.
  • AI Slop and the Quiet Cost of Foraging · Maggie Appleton calls it jetspraying the web with AI slop. Here is why that cheap flood is so exhausting, told through Information Foraging Theory, and why your tiredness is a rational response, not a personal failing.
  • Explaining Without the Lecture · I got called a bad explainer, and I think I earned it. The fix isn't reading minds. It's the curse of knowledge, Grice's maxim of quantity, and treating an explanation like a game of catch instead of a monologue.